Deal, I’ve got plenty of small hobby projects that can use some!

Oh dang, how long until some company just feeds their entire codebase into an llm and calls it documentation?

It’s not about consent. No one is suggesting rape

It’s different from person to person. The most consistent thing I’ve found is people trying to fit each other into a cultural box

I can name a few examples of this

You ok?

Oh nice!

Busy visuals. I don’t mind a lot of sound and light. But if there is too much going on it is overwhelming. It could be a tray of glass falling, or the way too intense colors of a candy store

Another day, another javascript framework

He can be that stupid, if you’ve noticed :p

She may buy into hype but still thinks for herself

I usually start off with some ai snippets. Like how terribly I keep forgetting hoe to open a udp socket :|

Anyways, with those 10 lines out the way (and de-shittified) I get going quite quickly

I do use it, it’s handy for some sloppy css for example. Emphasis on sloppy. I was kinda hoping you actually had something there

You can prove your point easily: show us a prompt that gives us a decent amount of code that isn’t stupidly simple or sufficiently common that I don’t just copy paste the first google result

You must be a big fan of boilerplate

I tried, it can’t get trough four lines without messing up. Unless I give it tasks that are so stupendously simple that I’m faster typing them myself while watching tv

You managed to get an ai to do 200 lines of code and it actually compiled?

A linter can get quite a bit more in depth than a file-to-file approach. At the very least you can use an ambigious character block list for function names

I have a bit of a radical approach preventing these issues: don’t allow unicode unless explicitly indicated or in contexts where it’s required or harmless

Google tools working well with google tools. That’s a handy!