The Supreme Court ruled that the president is above the law during Biden’s term. It was entirely in his power to take enforcement action and let the courts sort it out later.

That ruling defined official duties so broadly it’s actually virtually impossible for anything he does to not be “official” by the SC’s standards.

The ruling outlined that official duties includes pretty much everything he does while president, unless he explicitly states it’s not in his capacity as president or for national interests, which he won’t do in court, so effectively, yes, he has complete immunity. The “official” part is just a fig leaf to give the ruling the appearance of jurisprudence.

That’s entirely valid, I just hope neither of you complain when your deliberately unclear intentions are misread.

In the history of western democracy, more like.

What?

It would probably be wiser to focus on healthcare access and nutrition than to make extremely expensive and already large pieces of equipment triple size as standard when alternatives already exist.

Netflix does the same thing with “supported browsers.” It doesn’t matter if it’s actually supported, just whether it’s one of the two or three it allows because it can do analytics or whatever with them.

Any day now they’ll dip low enough and Schumer’s gonna GET 'IM. He’s got a plan!

There’s a good chance that the free buffet won’t last forever. They want to get their tendrils as deep as they can when the door is wide open.

You had the option of not voting and letting more informed people decide, at a bare minimum.

Delusional

If there is no difference on the only issue you allegedly care about, then why the hell did you vote for the monster??

deleted by creator

Actually very interesting, I wonder if this ratio holds up throughout history.

Bold to assume that’s not all of their savings.