• 0 Posts
  • 477 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 29th, 2023

help-circle
  • Bytemeister@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzWhich way?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    On the flip side, I had partial nail removal on two toes each side, and haven’t had any issues in 20 years. Procedure was quick, mostly painless, and the relief was immediate. I was playing soccer 3 days later.

    If you want to ask about a full removal, go for it, but be open to professional advice.







  • Devils Advocate here…

    Hypothetically she is right. Making elevated levels of antibodies long after a vaccination or exposure may not be normal…

    Now on the flip side, other things that aren’t normal. Air conditioning, 99% of children surviving past their first birthday, solar panels. Just because something isn’t “normal” doesn’t mean that it is bad.

    It could also be that we’re being constantly exposed to COVID in 2025 since we failed to contain or eradicate it, and the population never got up to herd-immunity level vaccination rates. Which would explain why the immune system is still making spike protein antigens.

    I’m also doubtful about the levels of spike protein antibodies she is claiming, I’d bet that there isn’t a peer reviewed article that supports that claim.








  • Bytemeister@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ideally, projects that are beneficial to everyone but unprofitable are picked up by the government. Like building highways and maintaining public lands… What we’re seeing in the US is what happens when you “run the government like a business”. It doesn’t mean efficiency, it means revenue generation for the board members. Sadly the fucking chuds in the US are too dumb to figure that out.


  • Bytemeister@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    Part of the problem is there is no market incentive for speculators and landlords to lower the costs of their units. They use software to set pricing with goes right up to the line of “collaboration” but doesn’t quite cross it.

    I like the idea of a tax or fine for empty housing that is porportional to the highest advertised lease price of the unit. Let’s say 10% for starters, so if an apartment wants to jack the prices up on their “luxury” units to 2k a month, they pay $200 every month that unit is unfilled. 100% of that fine goes to subsidizing housing for low income renters. Now we have an incentive for housing prices to go down, but still have the ability for them to go up to meet actual market demands, and we provide more money for lower income renters to afford that housing in the first place. It also gives us another “lever” to pull to manage the housing market. Increasing or decreasing that tax/fine rate to manage real estate bubbles.