You seem to equate any opinion on this topic that does not call for the dissolution of the state of Israel with zionism. And obviously, you regard zionism as something very negative (I’m not saying it isn’t, I’m just trying to be comprehensive and therefore state something trivial, too). Ergo, you seem to regard the existence of the state of Israel as something negative. The logical solution to that is that you see the dissolution of the state of Israel as something desirable.
Now, keep in mind that the following does not have a say about anything regarding the situation in Gaza. As I stated elsewhere, there’s a genocide happening against Palestinians, there’s no denying that and anyone supporting that is just an asshole at least.
However, what do you think would happen to the Israeli that currently live in Israel? I’m not talking about West Bank “settlers” or other genocide tools, I’m talking about the majority of Israeli, the civilians, the jewish families who lived in Israel for generations now. They’d most likely be killed, displayed and all of that. And that’s genocide, too.
Was creating the state of Israel a mistake when it happened? Probably. Would a single state where everyone lives together peacefully preferable? Definitely (and globally so, too). But is it possible to dissolve the state of Israel without a genocide against the jews there? Highly unlikely.
Hence you’re arguing to answer genocide with genocide.

Also, I’m not going to get deeper into the argument. I never really wanted to get into this topic and I still just not want to get deeper into this cesspool. You made me though and therefore I’m blocking you now and I hope you’re gonna be able to reflect on some stuff. Farewell.

No, not when paired with zionist apologia. It would be like saying 'The nazis are committing genocide, but they still have a right to exist"

I didn’t though.

So, explaining German law is zionism now?lmao.

and of course you are free to appeal in the future

Yeah, no, thanks, I’m fine. I don’t want to be in a community with people who want to answer a genocide with genocide.

Lol, I don’t though.

This aint victim Olympics, WW2 was 80 years ago, Gaza is now.

That’s not the point, never was (at least not mine). Anyway, that’s also not the point O want to discuss here.

But I agree with you. The lefties once more tearing up itself while the fascists are laughing.

First check the dates. As mentioned, the ban happened a week ago, the comment you’re referring to was posted afterwards.

Second, isn’t it enough to state that Israel is conducting a genocide against Palestine to make clear I’m against that? I mean, who actually likes genocides (except for some rare weird and dangerous lunatics)?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

What a coincidence. I saw Serious Sam on sale earlier today.

deleted by creator

I personally like emblems, icons and heraldry on flags. Without them, flags are often enough just bars of colors.

I know about the alternatives. That wasn’t the question though.

Why can’t you just bring the reasons you think are important?

Vice versa for me tho

Care to elaborate? Like, why, maybe provide some resources, etc.

The difference is the number of athletes caught doping recently.

Look at the username. Downvote, report for spam, move on

With your sister? No kinkshaming, but that’s something different

Could get on board with the latter.

Memes can be bad, agitating, stirring up shit, just like all other media.