• 9 Posts
  • 263 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2024

help-circle








  • You’re omitting the part where you call a third party "an idiot

    Again, this is irrelevant. Not part of the exchange I have been banned for and it was a reply to him calling me an" embarrassment". For the context, it was a guy defending genocide denier. He also posted in this thread - I suggest you have a look.

    your answers to the genocide denier were both passive aggressive as fuck.

    Firstly I disagree with that. Secondly this is again irrelevant - being “passive aggressive” is not a bannable offence.

    But by claiming that you weren’t being aggressive you are simply lying.

    I completely disagree with that. None of my comments were aggressive.

    No, it is not. It shows that you’ll likely to behave like an arse in any community that allows it.

    It is completely and utterly irrelevant. You may be an angel in one community and the devil in another. If there was a Israel/IDF supporting community the guy I was responding to would be an angel.

    None of those involves either the feddit.org mods or the Zionist Reich, but in all of those you’re being aggressive towards other users

    Nope. Now click each of them for a context. I stand behind every single one of them.

    You are lying yet again.

    Stop accusing me of lying.

    You are a fucking arsehole, and someone without the dignity to admit they’re a fucking arsehole. Please do a favour for everyone and go back to Reddit

    Now, my answer to this should be “go and fuck yourself”. But since you put your comments so nicely I am going to pat you on your head and just say “yes, sweetie” 😂

    If anyone is aggressive here, including name calling it is you. Now, disengage.


  • You were consistently aggressive in that thread

    No. I mostly only posted this genocide denier his own words. Calling someone defending use of human shields a “genocide apologist” is factual, not aggressive.

    your mod history shows entries like “uncivil”, “Derailing”, “civility”, “Rude/toxic”, “history of netiquette violations”, “consistent history of toxic behavior” across multiple instances.

    Firstly, this is irrelevant. Secondly when you get to the details, most of these comments are made by infamous feddit.org mods - who very recently came out of the closet and started banning reasonable criticism of Israel. Fill your gaps.

    So even if the target was justified, you’re still a problem user,

    I am who I am. I say what I think.

    Plus you’re a single “I can only guess” away from witch hunting = calling the mod “genocide apologist” on weak grounds

    See my other comment. I did paste screenshot of his disgusting defence of IDF, verbatim. This triggered the mod who called it “smear” and he doubled down on calling it “smear” again in this very thread. If calling a guy like this a “genocide apologist” is a smear for the mod, that’s very telling about mod own views.








  • It’s not the purity tests, taking things out of context, hostility, or trollish behavior.

    Stop lying. I did paste screenshot of his disgusting defence of IDF using human shields and told them they were “genocide apologist”.

    You removed this comment and banned me.

    It’s not the smear campaign you’re STILL going on about while taking things out of context to “prove” your point.

    Calling someone defending use of human shields a “genocide apologist” is a smear now?!

    It’s not the fact that I explicitly said that this is a no-politics community and was only allowing the post to remain up because it was about political discussions in general. And you decided to bring explicit politics into it

    What political discussion did I bring?

    It’s not the fact that your have a [LONG historyof bad-faith behavior and derailing conversations with your shtick.

    Your point is?

    No. It can’t possibly be any of that. It must be because I’m a genocide apologist

    Since you are STILL claiming that I somehow smeared the guy defending use of human shields than yes - you must be one of them. It is either this or you are as bright as a broken bulb. Which one is it?