I mean she’s kind of de-facto stateless at least until she is old enough or finds some other caregiver in the US. If she’s only a citizen of the US but can’t survive there then is there any difference between that and being stateless?
lol you gotta change your email preferences. I don’t let them send me shit.
Interesting but it’s important to remember that Europeans and their plants have been in the Americas for over 500 years now, which is plenty of time for oral traditions to develop. I’m not saying it’s untrue but I’d be curious to see what the genetic evidence says, since that would be a verifiable way to confirm. But in my experience dandelions grow almost exclusively in human developments, so it would be pretty surprising if they were native here.
How has he ruled in any of the Palestine free speech cases?
Wait, what? Expand on this.
Make sure you publish that shit somehow so the next person doesn’t waste their time on the same experiment.
AKA bedstraw. Known for being used as bedstraw back in the day.
Well there are certain features needed for a plant to get that big. So those features had to evolve independently each time which is a bit interesting. Wood is the famous example.
If only there was some way to know that this would happen!
Tucker Carlson doesn’t believe in anything. He’s a pure opportunist. This suggests the cracks are appearing in the Trump coalition, that such narratives can start to appeal to his audience though.
It was restored once they realized what happened.
I didn’t see any other comment removals in the modlog. Posting the modlog is a rule here for a reason. If my understanding is incorrect then you need to prove that in a way that can be verified.
This is so dumb I want to chalk it up to a mistake but I can’t think of how it could be. Puzzling. Will give @[email protected] a chance to explain before casting judgement.
Edit: I believe this is a misunderstanding of the situation. Here’s the original comment, which was not identical to the one Jordan then posted. It may have been removed by mistake. I’m guessing they hit remove instead of reply which is why the comment showed up as the reason for removal.
Always post the modlog folks!
The owners don’t control every decision made by every writer or editor, but it’s true that they do have excessive influence and power to kill some stories or promote others.
But I meant how does this article in particular make liberals and leftists fight?
I see this article as a growing shift in tone from liberals towards a greater skepticism and criticism of Israeli actions. This would mean they’d align better with leftists, not worse.
Every organization has issues. That doesn’t mean there hasn’t been good journalism done under its banner.
There are a lot of good rank and file journalists at NYT, and they have resisted attempts by the higher-ups to censor them. So there has been both bad and good coverage on this topic as a result.
Give the propaganda time to work. They’ll come around. Trump is these people’s whole identities, once he has a chance to tell them what to think, they’ll change their minds.
I actually believe it’s a mistake. He seems like way too much of a pushover to come out swinging like that.
Right, I don’t disagree with what you’re saying, just pointing out it’s a bit of an academic distinction at this point.
But probably not the right way for the media to describe it, so I see your point.