Right, they act the way they do under specific material conditions and environments. Those can change.
If you just looked at prisoners and concluded humans are highly prone to violence, you would be missing the point.
Right, they act the way they do under specific material conditions and environments. Those can change.
If you just looked at prisoners and concluded humans are highly prone to violence, you would be missing the point.
It’s capitalism, not humans exactly.
Great, So you’ll join me in having an anti-imperialist stance so we don’t foment the most reactionary elements of a country.
While reactionary, it is the force that was resisting the occupation. Im sure the people that prefer them to a foreign occupier is higher than you think.
Maybe the Afghanis didn’t want to be a vassal state to the country that was invading them for 20 fucking years.
Crazy they don’t yearn for the boot.
God I hate these psuedo intellectual racist cunts.
[Redacted]
I’m not thoroughly read up on theory and I’m not about to heavily defend the previous argument. I’m still not certain after reading in between replying here.
I don’t see why a centralized state can’t have more flattened power hierarchies, especially as needs and material conditions are improved.
Plenty of communists see a form of Anarchism as the goal endpoint, but realize the need for strong state power in the hands of workers to get there.
This is faint praise given he was a demented fossil facilitating a genocide.
You know what I meant. Being obtuse doesn’t help your case, it just makes you look like a debate pervert.
Neat how you ignored the rest of the sentence there. Probably because those aren’t contestable points huh?
As a leftist:
It’s worse than that. Flushing away $200M would be more useful given those weapons destroy and kill.
Scheduled job, but implies that it uses a cron format.
It seems fine but I had to check the “order” and it seems like it’s color(6) / origin(7) or maybe purpose(9). https://7esl.com/order-of-adjectives/
I don’t think it sounds off enough that someone would call it out.
Edit: I had to dig deeper, apparently you could consider it a “noun adjunct” which means it would be valid.
If all third party voters swapped to Harris, she still would have lost. Vote shaming doesn’t work and it’s especially gross when it wouldn’t even matter.
Read the last sentence again please
Sorry your blue team proto-fascists couldn’t contain their disgusting bloodthirst enough to win the election from the red team fascists. Think outside of this bullshit electoralist thinking for just a second.
Oh so you’re just totally on board with the genocide and ethnic cleansing operation of 2 million people in Gaza now. Very cool and normal.
Simply, be a person someone would want to spend time with and (probably) be intimate with.
Flip it around, what would you want in a partner? If you can recognize what you care about or don’t, you’ll have a better understanding of someone else doing the same thing.
Obviously everyone is different and there aren’t perfect rules, but make the effort to self reflect.
Things that were once revolutionary or novel for the time can only exist in that space for so long. The elements that worked can feel mundane and like a trope by our modern standards. The mistakes will also be only more highlighted over time as well.
Obviously that’s just a generality. Even if those games aren’t as good, it doesn’t mean they aren’t still good and enjoyable.