That is such an incredibly inaccurate and misleading title for what the project is about.

The Apothecary Diaries - airing right now

Ya boy Kongming!

The Eccentric Family

Hinamatsuri

Amagi Brilliant Park

Heaven’s Design Team

Wouldn’t not tying it to Switch online be better for preserving it and increasing its longevity? And the game isn’t that short. Rather than renewing the online subscription when I don’t have time to make good use of it I prefer this.

Exactly this right here.

But considering that humans do get copyright strikes when they do something too similar that should also applies to AI, doesn’t matter if it’s not exact.

“There are differences in the way men and women feel and think,” one flyer reads. “One of the reasons for this is the structural difference in the brains of men and women. It is known that men act based on theories, while women act based on emotions.”

Ew, it’s the whole thing and not just a one sentence slip. Not surprising, but still disappointing. Being an angry asshole because of testosterone is still 100% acting on emotion and not logic.

Another incorrect assumption.

And yet no reasoning given. A rather pointless response. It suggests you don’t have reasons to support your hate.

So to make a summary, for you people I am insecure, pro slavery, against women be able to vote, anti civil rights and pro totalitarianism. Anything else?

How about you stop victimising yourself and reason something meaningful for a chance? Apparently, it’s okay for you to say the side you disagree with is getting brainwashed (remember, you used the word first), and mutilating themselves (also, your word, which is wrong btw), but it’s not okay for other sides to say the same to you? Quite a hypocrite we have here.

When did i express hate?

Literally the points you are expressing. You are supporting making choices illegal to people. Choices that are extremely meaningful to some. You are encouraging their persecution.

The only one here receiving hate It’s me and i am being hated by the people who profess to spread love.

Again, stop victimising yourself LMAO.

I am a woman and your opinion sucks. Just how many percentage of people who transitioned do you think compete in sport at professional level? That’s a completely invalid reason to make it illegal for people to transition. You can disagree with having transitioned women compete in women sport, but it’s a completely different matter from the anti human rights and freedom of choice view point to stop people who want to from transitioning. It’s ridiculous this even need to be spelled out to you.

Moreover, this sounds like it stems from your insecurity more than anything, and I don’t believe that is at all a valid reason for gate keeping people. And should I mention how you lump the whole LGBTQ in the issue you have with just transpeople? You’re just hating (or conditioned to hate) and it’s petty.

Let’s go a step further, there are non binary people out there. Are you going to hate on them just because they are born that way? It’s fucking stupid.

It’s probably more meaningful to ask at this point what data can he collects that he’s not collecting.

Yes, I understand :) Just thought it’d be nice to increase awareness of the problem.

I get having megathreads, but currently kbin doesn’t care whether a post on Lemmy is pinned, so megathreads make it harder here to follow news and discussions on the topic.

And note that many subs have trouble recruiting moderators even when they want more people.

Can’t be done unfortunately. There’s a limit to how many pending moderator invites there can be. r/politicalhumor did the next best thing though.

What I hate most about it is people are doing very poorly at checking their own information intake for accuracy and misinformation already, this comes at one of the worst time to make things go south.

A recent report saying the opposite, but with proper data to back it up unlike this poorly thought out personal anecdote.

https://www.deweysquare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/DSG-Snapshot-of-the-Twitter-Migration-June-2023.pdf

And you might say ‘That’s different, slavery is bad and advocating for its abolishment is good, but advocating for Donald Trump is bad’, but that is the point.

This is where you misunderstood. The problem here isn’t slavery is bad and advocating against it is good and how that compares with the_donald. It’s that in the US, many countries in the EU, Australia, and New Zealand*, getting arrested or harmed by the government simply for speaking isn’t something to worry about. So, the people who use “free speech” to hide behind are, almost by default, bad actors. Even if you count mainstream (the citizens), no one is trying to harm the person speaking. In this case here it is also the opposite. What these racist fkers say (and do) can certainly hurt and harm other people, and they are doing everything they can so they don’t have to be responsible for their own speech. Hence, the “free speech”. It’s a similar tactic to opposers blending into a group of protestors and trying to sabotage by staging violence.

Now, if it’s another country where free speech is not where it should be. I’ll use my own country and it’s outdated and stupid lese majeste law as an example. Free speech here isn’t completely polluted by those bad actors yet because it still holds a very real value to combat tyranny. So, what I’m saying is this “free speech” problem in the US is a first world country problem, which should not be confuse with what free speech is about in more oppressive regimes.

People already heard what they had to say long ago, and it’s not welcome. So at this stage it’s about not letting them run all over everyone else. It’s not as if they have anything different to say from before. The answer is still the same, their racism is bad, their anti-science believes are bad, their disinformation are bad, their actions toward the LGBTQ+ communities are unacceptable etc. What else is there to listen to?

*Purposely left out Canada here.

Free speech isn’t just a right, it’s a responsibility. Too many people touting free speech don’t understand that.

I think the best outcome is for Fediverse to succeed at proving the model is better for users than mega corps. Then grow and last long enough until the EU takes notice, such that if any bad actors try to ruin it they’d want to protect it. We’re probably talking far into the future, but I think if handled well it can get to that point.

Even before gaining control of Twitter, Musk would take a proactive approach to addressing criticism.

Back in 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that Musk actively monitored Twitter for tweets containing the hashtag $TSLA, often used by Tesla short-sellers. Musk would reach out to executives at companies to investigate employees who were potentially publishing negative tweets about his electric vehicle company.

During that time, Musk reportedly emailed former Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess in July 2018, questioning whether one of Diess’s employees was using Twitter to criticize Tesla anonymously. Business Insider later reported that Volkswagen determined the tweets were posted by the employee’s brother.

Musk also allegedly texted Lawrence Fossi’s employer. According to the WSJ, on July 23, 2018, Musk sent a text to the top executive at Fossi’s company, asking the boss whether he knew his employee, known on Twitter as Montana Skeptic, “was obsessively trashing Tesla via a pseudonym,” as disclosed in the report.

Straight from the article, for anyone wondering.

So much for free speech. The worst part is there will still be a brigades of mindless idiots and scumbags who will defend him.