Reagan suffered no consequences for Iran-Contra, you think this’ll be different? There will be a singular Ollie North and then it’ll all just go away.

… just ss they appear …

This also works.

I can’t wait until they airbrush him out of pictures.

You had me at shoot.

Are they prepared to back up that support with violence as necessary? If not, that “support” is ephemeral.

And for US House districts

They’re going to have ChatGPT review the applications, so why not?

deleted by creator

Even when the galaxies do collide, the number of stars passing close enough to each other to disturb any planetary systems is zero.

That’s not what “stateless” means.

https://www.unhcr.org/ibelong/about-statelessness/

The international legal definition of a stateless person is “a person who is not considered as a national by any State under the operation of its law”. In simple terms, this means that a stateless person does not have the nationality of any country. Some people are born stateless, but others become stateless.

Yes, the experience she has right now, being a US citizen in Brazil, means that her current experience is surely quite similar to what it would be if she were stateless. And the path forward is definitely full of obstacles.

But she is not stateless. She is a US citizen with a US passport. Her situation is caused by her government illegally sending her to another country.

She is not stateless. She is an American citizen. Wrongly deported, yes. Stateless, no.

Ted Cruz used a Fox News interview to act as a human shield for Elon Musk, …

Bold play, assuming that Ted Cruz is human.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bond-market-worrying-something-may-103454446.html

Or –

When children are required by law to be schooled, and when the State provides public schools for that purpose, maybe, just maybe, the students who attend those schools for the purposes of general education should not have that purpose politicized.

Nah dude, having mental health issues isn’t a license to be a penis.

I will never look at prime rib the same way.

Someone with standing has to file a case in court, then get a ruling in their favor.

Until then, this would stand.

If you’re wondering about “if no security was given”:

To require a security or bond to be given in civil proceedings seeking to stop alleged abuses by the federal government would effectively immunize such conduct from judicial review because those seeking such court orders generally don’t have the resources to post a bond.

They want to require plaintiffs to post a bond (security) as a prerequisite to an injunction being enforced.

The pages were probably blank.