Did they see a bad moon rising?

That’s nice of you, thx!

In my experience Linux repos don’t tend to include stuff like ComfyUI

What I meant is that I’m baffled that the tech from waaay back then isn’t more widely available by now (as widely available as “even the debian repos got a version of it”).

Them you can run it locally. You might be able to run it on RAM only but it will be very slow, but fort your use case it might be fine.

I could, but inswapper_128 seems ok to use for nou. Now I need to check if my org would be ok with that approach. 😬

Thanks for the tip. I’d still prefer to run it locally (considering I want to protect identities… but I guess that you can paint over the faces with blobs and stable diffusion does the rest).

I’m honestly a bit baffled that it seemed so easy for snapchat 10 years ago and you can’t find this stuff in the frikkin Debian repos.

But those faces were swapped. (E.g.: that’s whoppie Goldberg to the far left)

Disengage

True. But depending on how much you pixellate that, those features are still commonlyseen when the faces are blurred.

Those are faceswapped. (Which shows how effective this is ;)

Check it with the original.

Where exactly? I couldn’t find any missed faces.

It’s not perfect, but for that stuff, I’d use SweetHome3D.

The point of blurring your face is to not attach it to your identity.

So is faceswapping

I was hoping for some more automated and clean looking solution. But thanks anyway.

I can’t make myself watch this obvious AI slop, sorry.

I found a github repo which uses insightface to do the exact job I wanted. I needed to fix the code a bit, but I managed to faceswap the crew of Star Trek TNG on the faces of these protestors who I found on a image search engine:

Bonus - Diego Luna on some stock image:

What am i missing?

Basically every bit of context.

I asked about software to faceswap photos for when my org wants to publish a pic were everyone who is on it doesn’t have to pixellate the faces, but rather faceswap the faces with other people (generated faces, historical figures, etc.).

I’d like to try that since everytime my org wants to take a photo (e.g. for showing international solidarity on social media), an argument arises of whether or not to pixellate the faces. Some people want their identities protected, other people think that pixellated faces damages public perception of the org.

How is that relating to anything you say?

How do I want to “endanger people” if I want to hide the faces of people in my org? WTF is wrong with you?

I already saidethat I am not interested in this discussion. Ask the people in my org. It always comes up when we’re doing some solidarity photo.

I’m not really interested in this kind of discussion. I was asking for a tool, not for a discussion of wether or not to use that tool.

That’s good for you, butedoesn’t apply to everyone.

Especially if both sides are fucking masked!

I’m not talking about the current situation in the US. I’m talking about e.g. protest in Europe which aren’t necessarily as heated up as the protests in LA right now. That might have not come across, sorry.

It’s just more friendly to non-radicalised folks if the sharepic of the local union don’t show up in balaclavas.