Looks a bit dried out?

It’s unacceptable that in year 2025 companies are refusing to make controllers with hall effect sensors. At this point I can’t think of it as anything other than planned obsolesence in order to sell replacement Joy-cons.

The project itself is very boring. This is why I sprinkle in fun stuff on top of the project that devs will get to do once the boring part is done.

But oh no! We had just enough time to finish the “boring part” and no time for “the rest of the project”, darn it! :(

“We must first implement base functionality, then we will add all the auxiliary components.”

x months pass

“Alright, base functionality has been implemented and it works. Good job team, lets ship it!”

Marie Antoinette didn’t have the foresight to first divide the populace into groups and pin them against eachother.

They are if they can’t afford a new computer.

Knowing:

• pwd, ls, cd, cat/less, cp, mv, rm, rmdir, rm -rf, ls -lah
• command --help
• man command | grep thing I care about
• bonus points if you have tldr command installed

The part that becomes transphobic is the insistence that the definitions are “transwoman” and “woman”. A trans woman (note the space) is a type of woman, no one denies that. It’d be like using the term “blondewoman” and insisting that they are different from every other kind of “woman”, and not included in womanhood.

I see, I wasn’t aware of this perspective.

Ada also pretty clearly stated why she didn’t link to the offending content: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/14101300 in that she didn’t want to start a brigade, which I honestly think is pretty upstanding behaviour on her part.

Not trans specific, and not really related, but I disagree with this view. Brigades are bad, they are the internet version of a street brawl and produce nothing of value. What I dislike is that “stopping brigades” usually also prevents actual discourse.

Let me just ask you (the general you, not the person I’m replying to) what exactly the need for defining trans women as not biologically female actually is?

What is the actual need for defining trans women separately then? Why are certain people so obsessed by this need?

I can only speak for myself: Since forever when someone uses the word “woman” in a conversation it is implicitly understood that they are referring to a cis woman. What rubs me the wrong way is that it feels like someone is forcefully trying to change that implicit meaning to mean “cis woman or trans woman” which would then necessitate referring to a cis woman as a “cis woman” instead of simply a “woman”, which in turn feels like I’m being forced to change the way I speak. I personally don’t think this is the case, but it is what it feels like. To me trans women are women as in, included in womanhood, and when I say the word “woman” in a casual conversation I’m implicitly referring to a cis woman.

Wtf, this isn’t hate. This is someone stating their perspective with no harmful intent. If anything that comment is a great starter to a serious discussion on the topic.

If Ada doesn’t want such content on their instance they have the right to defederade and I fully support their right to it, no matter the reason (it is their instance after all).

I can understand why someone would disagree with that comment, but calling it transphobia or hate speech?

“The whole concept of ‘importance’ is a figment of our imagination.”

*typo’s

It isn’t, at work we’re in the process of evaluating how useful it can be and a bunch of people received Cursor licenses to test it out.

If you’re trying to do something common it works great as long as you are concise enough. The moment you try to get it to do something obscure it starts failing miserably.

It is perfectly fair in the context of “fuel”, a resource used to produce energy. Whether energy is generated via chemical or nuclear reaction is irrelavent in this case.

And since Arch is rolling release it’s python-lib, not python3-lib. :)

Problem is that distro1 has req-lib2.5.3 while distro2 has req-lib2.7.8, but your project was developed on distro3 with req-lib2.9.5 so you have to deal with every distro having different lib versions and compatibility issues that come with it, not just different packaging formats.

Yup, it’s something I myself recently started to realise and have been forcing myself to read things that actually interest me.

While in elementary and middle school every 2 months we had a specific book we had to read and then would discuss it in class and would be graded based on our input.

Reading books and writing essays has been cemented in my mind as a boring chore that is forced upon me. It took years before it even occured to me that reading might be a fun activity, and a couple more before I actively started trying to read again. It’s difficult to break away from the mould I’ve been set to during my childhood, but I’m slowly chipping away at it.

Children SHOULD read, but how can we get them to WANT to read?

I am a young person who doesn’t read recreationally, and I avoid writing wherever I can. Thank you for sharing your insight as well as sparking an interesting discussion in this thread.

Thank you for this gem.

Looks like someone wants to get off of Mr. Glucose’s wild ride!

Security is a big focus for gov usage, why not base off of Debian?