I’m not exactly sure how they set up the back end. We are all home labbers though and I haven’t seen any unknown players on. One of our guys is on through most of his work day and would have noticed too.
I’ll mention it for sure though, just might be a pain if one of our IPs changes and they may not go for it. Thanks for the suggestion!
My friends and I recently fired up a private (local) Minecraft server with mine colonies, man of many planes, and a few other select mods. We connect directly via IP at my friend’s house and only we are on the server, so no worries of griefers or internet randos.
Mine colonies is a lot of fun. Takes out a lot of the monotonous building exercises if your not very creative with making actual buildings, and leaves you to explore as you want.
We all have separate colonies but decided a few villages we can only work on together when more than one person is online and have to work together on the same village.
Why does Sonic need a car in the first place? Wishing they would remaster Sonic R from the Saturn already. That would be a day one buy for me.
So you’ve acknowledged the same issue, and instead of offering a solution to their issue, you decide to criticize them. They even said they’ve used Arch for 5 years. That’s not a small amount of time to be using an OS. You are what’s wrong with the Linux community, not OP.
I think he means HyperTerminal. It was the predecessor to Putty basically for serial connections.
Have you modified the default unbound config at all? This sounds like increasing the cache size limits and timeframes in the unbound config could help.
I’m actually chasing an issue I’ve always had where everything works great in my environment, but on mobile certain domains take ages to finally load up for me. I think it’s a combination of my Pihole blocking and the amount of domains tied to a page (advertisements and tracking), but would love to figure it out. I work around it right now by flipping wifi off and on again in those instances.
Instead of port 53, I need to run unbound on 5335 (or another obscure port).I believe I also had to make some host level changed for DNS to operate correctly for incoming requests.
Here’s my podman run commands. These might have changed a bit with Pihole v6, but should still be ok AFAIK.
#PiHole1 Deployment/Upgrade Script podman run -d --name pihole -p 53:53/tcp -p 53:53/udp -p 8080:80/tcp --hostname pihole --cap-add=CAP_AUDIT_WRITE -e FTLCONF_REPLY_ADDR4=192.168.0.201 -e PIHOLE_DNS_=“192.168.0.201#5335;192.168.0.202#5335” -e TZ=“America/New York” -e WEBPASSWORD=" MyPassword" -v /var/pihole/pihole1:/etc/pihole -v /var/pihole/pihole1/piholedns/:/etc/dnsmasq.d --restart=unless-stopped --label=“io.containers.autoupdate=registry” docker.io/pihole/pihole:latest
#UnBound1 Deployment/Upgrade Script podman run -d --name unbound -v /var/pihole/pihole1/unbound:/opt/unbound/etc/unbound/ -v /var/pihole/pihole1/unbound/unbound.log:/var/log/unbound/unbound.log -v /var/pihole/pihole1/unbound/root.hints:/opt/unbound/etc/unbound/root.hints -v /var/pihole/pihole1/unbound/a-records.conf:/opt/unbound/etc/unbound/a-records.conf -p 5335:5335/tcp -p 5335:5335/udp --restart=unless-stopped --label=“io.containers.autoupdate=registry” docker.io/mvance/unbound:latest
I just went through my setup to verify dnssec settings in unbound to troubleshoot strange latency when removing random names while browsing. Did you verify the unbound certificate file was created and had the proper permissions? There are also a couple other configuration items in unbound related to dnssec that can be tweaked to improve the implementation.
I do exactly the same thing for all three of these services! My implementation is on podman rather than docker, but basically the same deal.
Watch the switch 2 announcement direct. It’s full of third party developers “happy to finally bring their games to switch” that have been released over the past 7 years on every other platform. Most of them playable on steam deck or other competing handhelds. I felt really bad for Nintendo during the direct and was a big decision point for me to not be a day 1 buyer even as an avid Nintendo fan. I will buy when the next major Zelda releases, and I will look for second hand devices before buying new.
Apologies, you mentioned specifically your network drive. Interesting article but they give several work arounds for containers that may require host mode, and it appears the non Plex pass image is one of them to resolve this specific issue.
I would go around them and go directly to the source of categorization. It looks like this is the Symantec categorization website in case it’s different from what you’re workplace provides - https://sitereview.bluecoat.com/#/
You’ve likely given it full control to whatever storage you’ve mounted in the container anyway, unless you’ve given it the :ro flag, which in that case would operate the same regardless of networking mode. If someone gains access to your internal host, you have bigger problems. Some things just play better under host mode and all bridged mode is doing is creating a virtual switch on your host and passing allowed traffic through it at a base level. The best way to protect is by running a load balancer in a DMZ and proxying all of the traffic through it which is how I have my instance running. I funnel everything external --> TCP\UDP 443 in DMZ vlan load balancer --> internal LAN IP:docker port. I run a mix of host network or bridged mode depending on the container.
Are you running in docker? Change from bridged mode to host mode on your container which should resolve this.
From a time when the jerk motion was used en mass. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2jvcd5
As someone else mentioned, this is only available to PlexPass users. Sorry for the confusion! I bought my lifetime sub over a decade ago at this point and forget about these inconsistencies that used to just be part of the product.
It all starts to make sense then. I need to set Jellyfin up soon. It’s only a matter of time before they come after the “Lifetime” purchasers like myself. I bought it over a decade ago at this point.
Strange that plex.tv isn’t blocked while a “personal” categorized website is. Have you looked to see what category your domain is shuffled under? You could try submitting a recategorization request to Cisco Umbrella or Fortinet databases. Requests for recategorization are free to do.
Thank you Internet stranger for reminding me of this sketch.
Oh nice, he may have already set it with account whitelist them, I’ll have to ask.