Hey thank you guys for your attempt to help, although I have already figured it out. I feel this is not the place for support requests, and my intention was rather just to share this funny error statement.

That was how I solved it ;)

Men you know hard it is to get therapy?

My client renders this as ( c )

This can also be used a great example of proof by contradiction: There is no correct answer in the options. Proof: Assume there was a correct answer in the options. Then it must be either 25%, 50% or 60%. Now we make a case distinction.

(A) Assume it was 25. Then there would be two of four correct options yielding in a probability of 50%. Therefore 50 must be the correct answer. -> contradiction.

(B) Assume it was 50. Then there would be one of four correct options yielding in a probability of 25%. Therefore the answer is 25. -> contradiction.

© Assume it was 60%. Since only 0,1,2,3 or 4 of the answers can be correct the probability of choosing the right answer must be one of 0% 25% 50% 75% or 100%. -> contradiction.

Because of (A), (B) and ©, it cannot be 25, 50% or 60%. -> contradiction.

I mean conceptually, not physically like between a park area and a road.

I think there is a difference between air quality (pollution) and co2 levels.

Like I always think that people don’t get one thing about trees in a city. There purpose is is not about co2. The co2 reduction of city trees is neglectable. The reason you need them in a city is temperature regulation, shade, air quality, mood, the local eco system and maybe solidifying unsealed ground. Putting these tanks in a city is laughably inefficient w.r.t. co2 conversion if you compare this to any effort to do this in instustrial capacity ( which is is also still laughably inefficient)

What is extroverted introverted?

man hes gone have to do a lot of walking again… Offtopic: The funny thing is TREE(3) is an absurdly long distance, independent of the physical unit. Even TREE(3) times the planck length is unimaginable long, as the ratio between a meter and the planck length is absolutely neglectable against such super large numbers.

This was originally some anti GMO certitifate

Im gone print this and hang it into office

The trick is just that everyone has to do it. Without exemptions for rich, influential etc…. (Ofc. not disabled, pregnant etc…)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_landscape

Oh the agony

Sorry typo

Day 492 of predicting edge cases…

Be carefull that they dont install that crowdstrike software automatically onto your installation