

Not enough X’s in that name.
Not enough X’s in that name.
But why male models?
F12 should open the browser developer tools, one panel will be the network requests.
It could be the accepts
header then… check if the request includes accetps: application/json
In my experience that is almost always the server returning an html error page.
Start with inspecting that actual response the first character is probably <
. The rest of it is likely to be a “not found” or “internal server error” (being the most common) page.
Then look at logs…
It’s one half of ‘bread and circuses’.
despite evidence of
In a nut shell.
Pretty much why everyone just uses json or, heaven forbid, plain text for trivial data.
Aaah, SOAP.
Yo dawg, I heard you like XML over HTTP so I put XML over HTTP in your XML over HTTP.
Gnome makes absolutely no promises of version compatibility for extensions.
You’re stuck waiting for an extension dev to update to support the new gnome version.
Ah. I figured it was plausible enough to ask for a source rather than out right rejected as bullshit.
I see now that was a “got a source to back up that outlandish claim?”
Agreed. That it’s even plausible is a sad state of affairs.
It’s no less bat shit crazy than what we do have sources for.
That server’s root access is now vulnerable to a compromise of the systems that have the private key.
From A Clockwork Orange for those who don’t know.
On the context of a node package,
It’s probably a package with one five line function, and a poor implementation at that.
An alternative, if you have console access, to doing that root password dance, is:
“Except for me, in my case it doesn’t count”
s/chatgpt/journalists/
too.
Isn’t there some kind of amendment about the security of the free state?