

deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I’m dumb enough that I was thinking it was “Owen, Owen, Fozzie , Owen, Owen, Fozzie, Fozzie, Fozzie…” before I figured out what the hell was going on.
Or when they can’t find enough workers and their crops die in the fields…
Gotta cash out before all the “value” disintegrates…
You know how much insurance costs on a Ferrari?
…/s. Any Replacements fans out there?
Pre-legislating from the bench. Why don’t we just get rid of the legislative branch and let the judicial branch do whatever it wants? ( …/s)
deleted by creator
Two for the cooter , one for the pooter…
Insurance companies give people discounts based on driving habits good driving habits, like the lack of speeding and hard braking… which can be determined by gps. They also charge more for people that drive more miles per year because it exposes the vehicle to more possibilities of being involved in accidents.
It’s not unreasonable for them to ask for access to your gps data… it is definitely unreasonable for you to give them access to your gps data.
What about that dick-vein?!
That’s a walnut, homey.
.
https://www.lendingtree.com/insurance/brand-incidents-study/
This is the article that comes up if you search that title. I had previously seen it. It specifically calls out dodge rams as having the worst drivers and still is just a summary of the data, not the actual study. Tesla is shown as number 2, but again, the details of the data are not in the text. Why are speeding and citations separate categories and how was the data collected?
Tesla definitely has a problem with bad drivers not adhering to their warnings and recommendations on using autopilot and fsd beta, and Tesla can do more to limit speed while in use, but the framing of this and the “source” article are being promoted in a way that doesn’t lend to credibility.
.