

Just pirate it over i2p. It’s very hard to block it there
Just pirate it over i2p. It’s very hard to block it there
Keepassxc. I’m a little skeptical to hosted solutions
You can write simple xslt to transform rss / atom feed to html and then pdf
Can’t we just filter them out by iptables rules?
Tell it to the Russian Linux devs that foss has no owners :-) Theory and practice are 2 different things
It’s based on BSD like Mach kernel
Most podcasts do have rss feeds ( that’s how Google podcasts did subscribe them). So find your podcast and subscribe him in f e fresh rss. You can open it in either brave ( background playing ) or vlc
So I think good luck for foss movement. Hopefully, forking that project won’t be illegal because otherwise foss will die
But where do you have information that it was russian state? There are many state actors capable of doing this. Just saying
Actually I’m interested how it looks legally ( it somebody cares about it at all ). Whether the Russian contributors could ask to revert their changes as they most likely never signed the contract to transfer their code copyrights. For sure it will have a big impact on foss because if you have at least one American and Russian contributors, you may get in the biggest shitshow. Additionally if I was considering now to become a contributors, I’d be wondering if it’s worthy at all to work for free and then to be banned no thanks for whole free work years
Lol, good that you pointed it out. The only real way is apparently only self hosting foss
Keep it all together with the code and use f.e. asciidoctor or rst ( python ). There is also doxygen but it’s not most user friendly
Hmm, it’s strange grey area. Sometimes piracy is the only way to make the book not disappear. There are niche, low circulation books and magazines which without piracy would disappear and became almost unavailable.
Sometimes the book is no longer in the print because of many reasons:
Ethics & piracy is pretty strange combination and there is no easy answer for it
The same you could say with “conversative” term meaning. In the original meaning it was “not willing changes” not “far right radical” whatever it means ( right now it’s considered to have conservative people in that group by left wing people )
Is there an email thread where c and rust Linux kernel devs actually discuss what’s about? Because so far I see some Linux drama and I have no slightest clue what’s about
Seriously, if you do take one verse from the whole response, you get straw men you fighting with.
I just told you that jabber / xmpp was created in the times almost nobody knew or believed mobile phones can be a thing. Thus it got created in that way: many similarities of xmpp and e-mail, irc or icq which didn’t stand the passage of time.
Of course, you’re right xmpp evolved to get PubSub extension as an “optional feature” but because of its availability (or rather lack) - most servers didn’t support it even the client did support, xmpp didn’t win the acceptance of the end-users. It got some attention in the business world (cisco jabber) but not in the retail.
Business cannot work forever without clients willing to pay or at least use, so it died off even in the business.
End of story, try not to fighting with the straw men you created.
XMPP is very old and was created when nobody knew about mobile phones. It worked more like true messaging app less than messages store ( unlike matrix ).
Requirement of permanent tcp ip connection doesn’t work well for mobile + pretty much useful feature in xmpp ( like message history ) is optional. If something doesn’t work in xmpp most people would blame xmpp / jabber rather than the lack of feature support in their server
Mastodon offers rss for both keywords and users
Hmm, what alternative? XML :-)? People hate Grade DSL just for not being xml
I’m ok as long as they add income & debts filters with real validation of this info :-)