Oh for sure, Fallout 3 Geoguesser would be hard. Idk, I just never had a problem navigating them, even if they were a bit samey.

Fallout 3. The criticism is absolutely fair*, but it was the first RPG I ever played and I’m still very fond of it.

* I never got the ‘metros are hard to navigate’ criticism, I never had that issues. Most of them are pretty linear.

The one I’ve heard the most buzz about is Rue Valley, but Travelling at Night does look interesting. Thanks telling me about it.

I just hope one of the ‘spiritual successors’ is able to live up to it. I don’t want to imaging going my whole life and not experiencing something like DE again.

That still only shows replies the server knows about, this article is about making sure all replies to a post are present on all servers.

FEP-1b12 (Group ferderation) kinda already alleviates this, our part of the fediverse doesn’t really suffer from the missing replies problem, but it’s a solution that doesn’t work well with microblog platforms.

I’m not the most knowledgeable about Mastodon’s APub implementation, but having a look at the Actor of that profile, it might be because it’s invalid JSON-LD. Now, Mastodon doesn’t actually do proper JSON-LD checks, you can follow PieFed profiles from Mastodon and they don’t produce proper JSON-LD, but they do include "https://w3id.org/security/v1" in their @context, and doing a code search of Mastodon’s source code does show some checks for if that’s included.

Lemmy’s I am familiar with and irrc it doesn’t even check if @context is present.

!emacs@lemmy.ml ? !emacs@programming.dev ???

Self-Hosting: Server: Easy (Leverage email hosting services) → Score: 18/20

Is it really self-hosting if someone else controls the data and software?

Oh, so when you make baseless assumptions about people it’s just you rationally arriving at a conclusion from context, but when someone else says your personality sucks based from your diatribe about women and dating, it must be because they’re an irrational, emotional wöman.

You’re literally attacking personality of someone you don’t know in that comment.

So she did, I’ll admit I missed those ones. Still, you have this still up on you account, undeleted, so I’d say YDI:

And I would feel fairly confident that the commenter was a woman because attacking someones personality (that they don’t know at all) is typically done by women. If they don’t like something you said they tend to tell you that you have a crap personality or a tiny dick.

This is the the death threat, btw:

bro I’m literally putting a curse on you rn. you’re going to die soon

Damn, I wonder why misogyny got a longer ban than that. /s

Spoken like someone without foot pedals.

Though this content could flourish in pockets of the fediverse, the scary scenario of prevalent child sexual abuse material is not the case. There are many moderation tools, including shared blocklists, that prevent it. However, the idea that the fediverse is full of harmful content was used by Elon Musk to justify his anti-competitive decision to block links from X to Mastodon.

Didn’t he unban someone who posted one of the worst CSAM videos known?

If a post contains content that is not allowed, the post should be deleted, that’s it.

OK, but what about content that is allowed, but has certain restrictions, like needs to be tagged NSFW. The current workflow to get this changed is: A mod comments under a pot telling the creator to tag it NSFW -> Remove the post -> wait for the creator to edit the post -> restore the post. This seems needlessly complicated and labour intensive, no?

gtk2 is gone 🦀🦀🦀

Doesn’t matter if they do, Lemmy cuts off the connection after streaming the number of bytes it wants.

Interesting. I’ve always considered an API a way to control some other software, while a protocol is about different software communicating. IDK, I just don’t consider APub’s S2S an API. Don’t know if that’d hold up in court, but that’s what I think.

It’s a protocol, which I suppose you could argue is an API though that’d be a very liberal definition of API.

Okay. So again, what’s the problem? Everyone should be happy.

No one on lemmy.world will see anything Sag posts, ~ 1/3 of all Lemmy users. Not the end of the world, but it can be demotivating.

Humor me for a moment - if you go to a website, directly, do you have to abide by their terms of service?

No, a TOS is a contract, you have to agree to it to be subject to it.

Where are you getting the idea that I’m saying TOS shouldn’t be enforced? I’m not saying that, I’m disputing who it applies to.

You said, and I quote:

I just don’t think banning a remote user for TOS violation is a good one.

Remote user, i.e. someone who’s account isn’t on lemmy.world. Local accounts on lemmy.world should still be subject to the TOS.