• 0 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • I watch a sketch comedy group that gets abused by YouTube’s moderation. Some of their stuff leans edgy, but the moderation and demonetization seems pretty arbitrary. There is no viable appeal process or viable alternative platform. Reminds me of how Google controls the Play store and removes open source projects for arbitrary or spurious reasons.

    I take less issue with aggressive moderation and more issue with the lack of infrastructure to handle the concept that the first line ai decision might be wrong.

    Adding to that - Google’s effective monopolization of “amateur” video distribution, and coincidentally monopolization of app distribution and monetization on the 70% market share mobile platform, makes it more problematic that the company is unanswerable to moderation mistakes.










  • We put so much important information/data through browsers (and smart phones for that matter), and it is becoming hard to trust third party code running on either. Trust in the publisher has become mandatory for me and the only browser plugin I run now is Bitwarden. Neither the app store operators nor the browser publishers seem to have an answer for reliably thwarting malicious actors. I don’t know what the answer is, other than developing literacy in writing browser plugins and adding functionality through my own code.





  • I like the preferred list concept. I also didn’t hate when lemmy world used a bot on news subs to post the media source’s political leaning and overall credibility to every submission. Many disagreed with the bot’s source of information, but what if every submission here got an automatic pinned **This source lacks consistent credibility because reasons… ** type post with you maintaining the list/assessment the bot draws from?

    Between moderation of the worst of the worst and a strong disclaimer on dubious sources, it might help visitors gain better media literacy.