

Which would only intensify the situation and draw other states into the conflict.
Which would only intensify the situation and draw other states into the conflict.
Quiet down bot. Your comments are irrelevant to the topic at hand.
No, I’m saying he already chose the working class and it hasn’t galvanized the working class to support him by a significant majority so I’m not sure it would have worked for Kamala. Bernie probably would have won a small majority, but done no better than corporate candidates have because the working class doesn’t seem to galvanized behind a candidate that does choose them.
I don’t have a ton of confidence the working class would choose someone who did choose them. Bernie is that candidate, and shenanigans aside from the dem primary, he didn’t swing a landslide.
How is this not just torture?
It was a performative spectacle to get his name in the news. Few of our elected officials have any actual skillset for good governance. They have a skillset for getting elected.
But you’ve spend decades convincing democrats that anger solves nothing and working with people is always the better way. Don’t be surprised you have no warriors when you’ve only been training sheep.
My mind is a distraction.
That’s basically how all trends work.
They aren’t even held to account, they’re mostly abused for trying to survive the abuse.
I meant his henchmen are accountable only to Trump, not that Trump was the only one held accountable.
Still rather a bear than a man though, amirite?
Why would any of Trump’s administration care? None of them have been held accountable for anything, except to Trump.
Trump throws a lot of punches but not many seem to land.
Not even close. That was the propaganda of the dem party trying to get him elected. Half the posts on the net are propaganda from some group or another trying to build a narrative, since that’s apparently the only way people can make sense of the world anymore. And here we are years later repeating the same fucking story because the propaganda affects both the supporters AND detractors.
Well he can’t exactly kill the world 's richest, can he? Its a stronger indictment about the risks of wealth inequality than about the morality of the rich.
Not really. They just keep pushing in a direction that makes it inevitable and then blame the people who resist for the violence they then inflict. They would rather everyone just do what they want without complaint. But if the law is broken and someone keeps stealing all your stuff, you have to either let them or try to stop them. As soon as you try and stop them, they’ll claim you started the violence. There is no winning against this, violent resistance or slavery seems inevitable.