raoul
- 0 Posts
- 27 Comments
raoul@lemmy.sdf.orgto politics @lemmy.world•Trump jokes about running for a third term in speech to House Republicans6·5 months agoOr even five words sooner.
The boolean operator ‘If and only if’ do not have a relation with the program instruction ‘if’.
The programatic ‘if’ is a jump, not a boolean operator. It do not have truth table.
In logic:, if and iff can be seen like functions taking two booleans and returning a boolean
-
‘if a then b’ (noted a -> b): return true if a is false or b is true. Example: ‘if I eat pizza then I fart’ This is true even if I fart all the time (if b is true, we do not care about the value of a) as long as I fart when eating pizza (if a is true, b must be also true)
-
‘a <-> b’ is equivalent to ‘a -> b and b -> a’: the two should be true at the same time. I can only fart will eating pizza and cannot fart otherwise.
-
It’s in the code tab: https://fossil-scm.org/home/dir?ci=trunk
raoul@lemmy.sdf.orgto Memes@lemmy.ml•How long before he starts talking about martial law now?8·7 months agoWWIII will get memed or will not be
raoul@lemmy.sdf.orgto politics @lemmy.world•I spent hours trying to persuade US voters to choose Harris not Trump. I know why she lost | Oliver Hall2·8 months agoIf I interpret the first figure of this article correctly, the 25% poorest of the population have always been ‘shafted no lube’ (pardon my economists jargon), but were about to have a wages growth above inflation; before the fight against inflation was finally won (well done, joe) and the slaves slaved again.
raoul@lemmy.sdf.orgto politics @lemmy.world•I spent hours trying to persuade US voters to choose Harris not Trump. I know why she lost | Oliver Hall9·8 months agoI think that the problem is that the metric used for measuring the wages growth is an average:
In a society where most of the wealth goes to a few, an average is not necessarily a good measure:
I like this image from this article from the fed
They have the following remark below this graph:
For example, about 57 percent of the WGT sample had positive real wage gains during 2019, whereas during 2022, only 45 percent of people had positive real wage growth. Put another way, despite higher median nominal wage growth, the share of people with positive real wage growth between 2019 and 2022 due to higher inflation fell by 12 percentage points.
Edit, from the bottom of the article:
Your own wage growth experience might not look like that of your neighbors or your colleagues, and it might not resemble that of the person with median wage growth either.
It’s having a bad hair day, give it a rest!
raoul@lemmy.sdf.orgto politics @lemmy.world•RFK Jr. Says He Plans On Getting Rid Of 'Entire Departments' At FDA And CDC In Alarming Interview3·8 months agoIn an apparent attempt to troll their political opponents, MAGA allies gleefully announced the extreme conservative blueprint is ‘on the Trump agenda’
…In an apparent attempt to troll their political opponents…
I’m depressed of this shit
deleted by creator
Finally some good fucking open research: https://jabde.com/
raoul@lemmy.sdf.orgto vegan@lemmy.world•Pro-foxhunting group says UK hunters should be protected ethnic minorityEnglish6·10 months agoAnd a prominent pro-fox hunting group says they should be an endangered species
Pillow makes spinach leave disappear 🧙🏼♂️
What’s the difference in the model travel path? One is horsing around?
😍