They probably used AI to help write it.

Qt Creator

Other mainstream distros cannot even be installed by blind users because screen readers are broken on wayland

Been using Ubuntu since 2008… looks like this will be the last year for me.

I meant no interest in using it.

macOS 26? I thought the last version was 15…

Time to switch then. I have no interest in wayland.

I wonder how long it will be until they start requiring signatures for individual people.

To me, any binary I do not have the source code for is random. I have no idea what’s in it and it could be doing any number of malicious things.

sudo curl

sudo random binary

Umm

Ok so effectively then this basically shifts the work from blocking IPs to blocking domains. It might slow down some smaller players, but I imagine anyone with a decent amount of money can afford an insane number of domains.

So when that gets blocked, they can just generate a new key. I don’t see how this really stops anyone that wants to keep going.

The article starts out talking about malicious bots that DoS your site, but how would a crypto signature fix that? Couldn’t the client just change the signature whenever it gets blocked?

Komodo

not MS-DOS Edit

sad.

There is, just google something like “url redirection service” and you’ll find lots. Your domain/DNS provider may already offer one as well.

Not strictly within the normal way DNS works, no. A CNAME record response can only contain another domain or subdomain name. You would have to run a webserver that listens on the IP that the CNAME record eventually pointed to, in order to handle redirections to a specific URL.

I’m a huge fan of bootstrap and I feel that writing CSS from scratch is much harder.

many native elements either do not function like people want or cannot be styled the same

potentially escaping the notion that because Qt is C++, it is not as safe to use.

How does this even potentially escape the notion? Qt is still C++, and still unsafe, no matter what you use for the rest of your application. And the fact that Widgets is being left out in the cold doesn’t sit well with me either.

They still won’t even say what these “bridges” are, other than it “does not necessarily replace existing bindings”. Does that mean it’s still yet another binding?

What would have been really nice IMO are some plain C bindings, for both widgets and QML.