A droplet of rain once passed through a completely closed car window and hit me on the cheek.

And Xfce4 doing the light heavy lifting as usual.

Glad you found it! Although I regret trying to help you because now my brain is forever tainted with this crap I had to listen to that has a similar cover art: https://music.apple.com/us/album/somebody-to-hold-single/1656102964

Oh and lsp-mode is super opinionated, it does a million things you don’t want or need, so I wouldn’t recommend that.

Well, OP mentions he cannot install software on the machine, so I think that already blocks anything depending on lsp.

My experience is mostly from doing linux kernel programming on remote baremetal machines. I use ccls + eglot locally and have fiddled a lot with tramp, which is really good when it does work, but also tends to trip over bad connections.

I’ve also wrote all sorts of elisp hacks to be able to access the remote machine via tramp but have all code navigation commands apply to a local repository replica where the lsp server runs. My use case was similar to OP but the machines were not x86_64, so there wasn’t even any lsp ported.

So yeah, my gut feeling having dealt with similar issues is that it’s not worth it, YMMV.

cscope? ccls? clangd? Surely there’s something there that the other people in the team are using.

That doesn’t really solve his issue because what he wants depends on having servers (lint, lsp) running local to the codebase/machine. Anything with emacs will be a major pain unless it’s a really small project.

Immutable vs Mutable

weird        normal

Leavers vs. putters

It’s always been this way. Except that it was kernel developers arguing with kernel developers over C code. Now it’s relative newcomers arguing with kernel developers over Rust code that the kernel devs don’t necessarily care about. Of course it’s going to be a mess.

A fork is of course possible, but operating systems are huge and very complex, you really don’t want to alienate these folks that have been doing exclusively this for 30 years. It would be hard to keep the OS commercially viable with a smaller group and having to do both the day to day maintenance, plus the rewrite. It’s already difficult as it is currently.

Rust will be a huge success in time, long after the current names have lost their impetus. This is not a “grind for 4 years and it’s done” project.

Words of wisdom right here.

Personally, what bothers me about the security field is how quickly it becomes a counterproductive thing. Either by forcing people to keep working on time consuming processes like certifications or mitigation work (e.g. see the state of CVEs in the linux kernel) or simply by pumping out more and more engineers that have never put together a working solution in their lives. Building anything of value is already hard as it is nowadays.

Look at them prudes implying that sex is not a beautiful and natural thing.

Wtf, just forget about it. What’s the point to bring this up now? Then what? A couple more years and you remember another little dirty detail from that night and put her through this all over again? You had your chance to be honest. Those are past waters now. Bringing this up again would just be a self serving way of using her to clear up your conscience.

People who use spaces are not taping space space space space space space space space. Their tapping the tab key all the same.

Wow, super newsworthy. Even included some bs about “colorful language”. Can’t let a thing like that go by without trying to entice some internet drama.

No one cares. Adoption of operating systems in the real world is not done based on popularity charts. Those only serve for memes and flamewars.