this is helped, thank you
- 20 Posts
- 64 Comments
Installed, but problem is solved, thx
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Linux@lemmy.ml•[SOLVED] lsblk and cfdisk show different results2·1 month agohelped
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Linux@lemmy.ml•[SOLVED] lsblk and cfdisk show different results4·1 month agoActually, I don’t really know differences between. Just all guides use cfdisk and I forgot about mbr and gpt. But I changed mbr to gpt using gdisk(after start he say, that I have mbr and gpt and which I want to use. I chose “create blank gpt” and now I can use gdisk to partition disk. And after gdisk lsblk show right information! Thats it
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Linux@lemmy.ml•[SOLVED] lsblk and cfdisk show different results1·1 month agosame as lsblk thank you for advice.
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Linux@lemmy.ml•[SOLVED] lsblk and cfdisk show different results1·1 month agopartprobe says:
Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048 bytes, but Linux says it is 512 bytes.
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agono
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agoreally struggling
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agothat’s what I looked for
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agowhen I just use
ufw allow [port]
command it’ll not work?
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agohow to check?
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agooutgoing, I guess. I mean, it’s on my vps which I want to use for vpn
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agoI understand it
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agoIt’s my port for wireguard and here what I can’t understand: when I blocking port for this wireguard service I still can use wireguard even if ufw deny it.
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agoI don’t use docker
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agocan you check it in my previous answers, please?
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish2·8 months ago, no, I want to open, for example this port, but:
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months agohow can I make sure?
someoneFromInternet@lemmy.mlOPto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•ufw's rules is not workingEnglish1·8 months ago
how is bad just to use proprietary codec? I try to use only open source solutions, but if it’s just codes is it so bad?