Yes, CTRL+Z undos, CTRL+S saves etc
- 0 Posts
- 346 Comments
Although micro already exists for this.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto Linux@programming.dev•What’s a good terminal emulator for windows to connect to ssh and WSL?3·2 months agoWezterm is available for windows. Still got some sharp edges. Windows terminal is pretty good though, even supports OSC 52 nowadays.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto Linux@programming.dev•What’s a good terminal emulator for windows to connect to ssh and WSL?4·2 months agoNu crowd represent!!!
You’re on of us then!
I, and many others, start closing stuff when there’s more than a handful.
Others, like many, just run then forever and ever. A sea of icons, tiny and compressed. Worrying they’ll lose that tab they really like in amongst the clutter. Unaware of the history feature.
I have a feeling this thread won’t be about Linux.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto Linux@lemmy.ml•Why doesn't the Linux subreddit leave Reddit already?3·2 months agoLinux is mailing lists, if anything. It’s definitely not Reddit.
I am so intrigued by Silverblue but given how stable Fedora is I’m not really sure I’d gain anything
Red Hat, way back in the 90s - must have been 5.0 IIRC.
Since then I went through Ubuntu and now landed on Fedora.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto Technology@beehaw.org•Tesla’s Remarkably Bad Quarter Is Even Worse Than It Looks5·2 months agoNever protested or did anything organised. Went from “yeah, a Tesla would be amazing to own” to “ugh, no thanks, don’t want to be seen driving that”.
Musk has only himself to blame.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•i use edit.com, notepad and geany btw3·3 months agomicro ftw
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto Technology@beehaw.org•Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity Portraits [404 Media]3·4 months agoThey don’t need to edit the article, just submit a decent photo to wikimedia. The editing can be done by others as soon as the portrait has been uploaded.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto World News@beehaw.org•The USA is immediately lifting the pause in intelligence sharing and resuming security assistance to Ukraine9·4 months agoI’m ascribing agency and competency to the military planners and to Rubio. Trump wouldn’t know which end of a lollipop to lick.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto World News@beehaw.org•The USA is immediately lifting the pause in intelligence sharing and resuming security assistance to Ukraine22·4 months agoFor Darwin sake, everybody can read this, right?
First Trump showed Ukraine that he can make Ukraine lose without US support. This brought them to the table again.
Now he aims to show Russia that they can’t win when Ukraine has US support. Trump will support Ukraine with new weapons and even more intel, possibly with permissions to use US weapons in deeper strike missions. This coincides with Trump getting Ukraine to agree to a ceasefire position (that Trump still doesn’t understand Russia will never agree to).
This will go on for 4-6 weeks, then Trump will realise “math is hard, yo” and properly give up on an attempt, blaming Russia, Ukraine and/or the EU.
Then by end of 2025 the recent Trump induced EU panic that caused Europe to react will have created a rapid expansion of European capability and will. Then the US will exit and the war will go on for another couple of years.
sunbeam60@lemmy.oneto Technology@beehaw.org•Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity Portraits [404 Media]24·4 months agoDarwin almighty if a celeb wants their photo changed on Wikipedia all they have to do is submit a decent photo they’ve taken themselves.
For most sites it’s a testing matrix issue. Most testing teams look at browser stats and choose how to apply their limited resources based on that. So the dev probably doesn’t even see the bug that exists for an old Firefox version as there’s no testing done on it.
That may be the case but a Science article on the resume is still something every working scientist covets.
Because the journals provide a quality gate. To be published in, say, Nature is a career peak for most scientists. While counting references to a paper can tell you some things about its relative merit, it’s not as clear an indicator as having a PNAS, Cell or similar on your resume.
They have created a market for their name so it self-perpetuates.
The “now the tech is done can we rationalise the dev team?” fallacy just drives me up the wall. Mostly because I’ve actually worked in environments where those questions were seriously pondered and had to defend against it.
You’re assuming they need to feel like they’re doing good? Some people don’t give a crap and will trample on anyone for a buck.