I responded at the tail of this back and forth, but in case no one cares to click through that conversation - you are incorrect.
No research indicates a lack of beard oil could cause greying.
I responded at the tail of this back and forth, but in case no one cares to click through that conversation - you are incorrect.
No research indicates a lack of beard oil could cause greying.
FINE I LOOKED IT UP. Because neither of you were doing it.
Dumblederp is right, there is no research that indicates a lack of oil could cause greying.
Greying is only caused by age, genetics and oxidative stress on DNA caused by free radicals (not a lack of oil).
100s of years ago, your ancestors boarded boats to come to America for a better life.
Are you so indolent and pampered that you’ll whinge and complain in America until you die?
Leave, GI, your country is abandoning you. Take your skills and education and emigrate to a country that treats you with respect, GI.
I’ll steelman her POV because it seems people are (rightly) confused.
Asexuals are requesting a day of recognition for what she sees as a negative-identity. Keep in mind, conservatives are often meritocratic.
It’s like if there were a day for “coffee refrainers”, for everyone who doesn’t like drinking coffee. I’m sure if someone dunked on that day and the coffee refrainers, it’d all be in good spirits.
But if someone dunked on asexuality, I’m sure it’d cause a lot of upset and defensive argument, which implies more “merit” to asexuality.
While progressives can go “who cares, just leave em be”, conservatives see all “non-deserved” attention as an affront to meritocracy, that needs to be squashed.
To be fair, I’m pretty sure the slave race of house elves continue being slaves because “they love being slaves”.
The burden of proof is on you. Provide evidence to the contrary.
Why only for some?
Why is there no reason to believe that
What other care do they get?
How isn’t it evidence?
Where’s your citation for this
I’m going to treat you like a toddler, because I genuinely don’t think you have the capacity for anything more. Here we go!
Billy no make marbles because people no buy anymore. Billy too many marbles!
Oh you’re being obtuse, okay. Maybe when you’ve grown up a little and can understand cause and effect you can have this conversation. Finish high school maybe? Get a degree, come back to me when you can actually talk with the intelligent people.
Billy is making marbles. Billy now has five marbles. Johnny buys all five marbles. Billy now has to make more.
One day, Johnny stops buying marbles. Question, does Billy endlessly continue making marbles forever? Or does Billy stop once he realises demand is causally linked to supply?
Let me know if this is still too complex.
Elwood farm
Removed by mod
The ones I used to buy meat from.
And if I and all other vegans started eating meat, they’d need to produce even more.
You do realise me eating meats means the world has to produce more meat right?
If Billy has 5 marbles, and Johnny asks for a marble, Billy now has 4 marbles. Billy will have to get another marble to have 5 again.
If Johnny doesn’t ask for marble, Billy will still have 5 marbles.
Am I going to fast for you?
They did reduce. Fewer animals have been bred to feed me as my demand isn’t there. Fewer emissions.
YIKES: