And we’re going to fucking revive measles and polio while we’re at it?

Yep. Thats the US right now.

As the contradictions grow with capitalism, they will fuel the revolutionary change of the proletariat…

https://sociology.institute/introduction-to-sociology/karl-marx-analysis-capitalism-historical-perspective/#the-contradictions-of-capitalism

all the churches should be struck down by whatever “God” they pretend to follow.

I mean, if we wanna throw their own book at them… Revelations calls them out. They’re the seven churches.

What happened to America’s passion to learn?

Unions died.

Republicans have been eliminating progressive news and media for years.

They really haven’t… The issue is far deeper than that.

Fear based pushing of media doesn’t work so well outside of a cult. The problem atheists have isn’t that we don’t have our own sunday services, where we teach a different “fire and brimestone” message… Its that those sorts of “tools” just don’t work with people broken away from indoctrination.

Way back when, I ran two “new sites”: One was a progressive media site, and the other a conservative one (Before I had a stronger moral compass), and running ads on both.

The progressive one earned almost nothing. The conservative one? I was easily bringing in ~$40/month in ad rev, without doing anything, really. I wrote two stories, about the same thing, and just tweaked the language for each to cater to the side I was publishing to.

Oddly, or not, the most commonly clicked ad was penis enlargement pills, and “Hot moms looking to cheat” type ads.

Those are only facts if someone enforces it at the business end of a weapon.

She lost, because (IMO) she basically gave a big middle finger to:

• Leftists
• Progressives
• Arab-Americans

And, because she decided these people were great people:

• Dick Cheney
• Bill Kristol
• Georgie Bush
• Mike Pence

You know? The war criminals and war criminal enablers.

The lesson Dems need to learn is that no matter how much they shift right, they’re not winning GOP voters. All they are doing is shedding voters on the left. The whole “Vote for us because other team is bad” rings hollow when you’re doing everything the other team is doing, too.

Harris was a full communist to the GOP.

I dont think it matters much.

Due process includes the process of your ballot eligibility being reviewed, and then denied, based on things that are prima facie.

Yes, sorry… the militia clause, as its known

The purpose of the militia is to put down insurrection, not to engage in it.

The word “regulated” has had only one actual meaning… the same as it means to regulate interstate commerce.

And only a couple of years later, the militia acts passed.

I pray you actually read what people point you too:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

He was literally telling them live on TV to go storm the Capitol.

That is called “prima facie”: facts that speak for themselves.

And it is fully valid to use as a test in a process already codified in law: secretary of state (or similar postition) decides ballot eligibility.

Nah, I was only replying to the part about you not being a 2a supporter, showing you dont have to be, in order to support an armed working class 😀

Please read why the 14th amendment extended the bill of rights to apply to people…

We didn’t see Trump break into the White House.

We saw him tell his people to go do it, and the refuse to tell them to stop it.

That’s called “leading an insurrection”.

I’m not keen on the 2A, based on it’s original purpose and use. I am, however, pro “Under no pretext shall arms and ammunition be surrendered, and any attempts to do should be frustrated, by force, if necessary.”

For all those reasons you named, are exactly the reasons I don’t want Dems curtailing the right to keep and bear arms.

Notice ICE focusing on low gun ownership regions?

We’re not all in the same group… I’m not an ICE agent, but I am a gun toting American working class person.

In this context when they write about a well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a “free State,” they actually imply that the security guarantee is against a tyrannical state of which they had recently been at war with.

No, it doesn’t. Read Article 8, as it describes what the militia’s purpose is. At the time “the people” meant “the states”, as each state was to be secure in it’s own abilities and authorities to manage it’s militias. The purpose was to put down insurrections and slave revolts.

Remember, also, that to be “in the militia”, you were also reporting for regular muster and inspections. By the government.

No it doesn’t. The role of the militias were to be called up to put down insurrection and slave revolts.