- 1 Post
- 13 Comments
wahming@lemmy.worldto Sync for Lemmy@lemmy.world•Sync for Lemmy Beta 34 release notesEnglish3·2 years agoAs in, you clicked the link I provided, and the link inside that link?
wahming@lemmy.worldto Sync for Lemmy@lemmy.world•Sync for Lemmy Beta 34 release notesEnglish6·2 years ago- Sync can now open lemmy links from the top 50 instances
https://lemmy.world/post/3769853 Doesn’t seem to work. The post linked there opens up in an internal browser
Edit: Click through to the lemmy.ml post
wahming@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Maker Naomi Wu is Silenced by Chinese Authorities (And Why I Blame Elon Musk)211·2 years agoFor those who dislike YouTube / videos:
https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes
wahming@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Maker Naomi Wu is Silenced by Chinese Authorities (And Why I Blame Elon Musk)4·2 years agohttps://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes
Not a transcript, but probably even better.
wahming@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.ml•There is a drop in monthly active Lemmy users (from 65k to 57k)21·2 years agoBut how many MAU did Rohan have?
wahming@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.ml•There is a drop in monthly active Lemmy users (from 65k to 57k)14·2 years agoI was, till lemmy got some decent mobile apps
The NYT is one of the biggest, most recognised publications worldwide. If they don’t meet your requirements, I don’t think that’s a realistic expectation
wahming@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Births in China could fall to 7 million in 202311·2 years agoadding over 7 million people is what’s important
It is not. When dealing with statistics, percentages are the only thing that matter.
If it was a country like Canada, with a population of less than 50 million people, that would be problematic.
Losing 15% of your population on a yearly basis isn’t problematic, it’s species-ending catastrophic.
But with a population pool of 1.5 billion, what’s the actual concern? What social instability does this cause that a population of 1.5 billion already doesn’t?
To put it in perspective, that’s the same population loss ratio that japan is currently experiencing. Japan, the country that’s teetering on the brink of cultural and societal collapse from an aging population.
There will never be too few people in China
Yeah this sums up the problem fairly well. You’re so stuck in your personal opinion of china’s population that you can’t imagine for a moment the situation changing, regardless of what the data might be saying. You’re no better than the people who refused to believe climate change was occurring. Fuck your gut instinct, pay attention to the actual numbers.
wahming@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Births in China could fall to 7 million in 20232·2 years agoThe number of people is irrelevant in the context, only the birth vs death rate. For context, there were about 10.5 million deaths in China last year. For social stability, you’d want the population to at most have a slight decline. A 50% higher death rate than birth rate is NOT slight.
wahming@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Ukraine to fire all regional military recruitment chiefs9·2 years agoSo essentially install a military dictatorship, because only the military gets any votes?
wahming@lemmy.worldto Sync for Lemmy@lemmy.world•The first part of localised pricing is now liveEnglish132·2 years agoBought it! A lot more reasonable and affordable with regional pricing enabled.
I’m using sync myself, but I think most of the lemmy apps have the feature by now