I’m using sync myself, but I think most of the lemmy apps have the feature by now

As in, you clicked the link I provided, and the link inside that link?

• Sync can now open lemmy links from the top 50 instances

https://lemmy.world/post/3769853 Doesn’t seem to work. The post linked there opens up in an internal browser

Edit: Click through to the lemmy.ml post

For those who dislike YouTube / videos:

https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes

https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes

Not a transcript, but probably even better.

But how many MAU did Rohan have?

I was, till lemmy got some decent mobile apps

Eh

The NYT is one of the biggest, most recognised publications worldwide. If they don’t meet your requirements, I don’t think that’s a realistic expectation

adding over 7 million people is what’s important

It is not. When dealing with statistics, percentages are the only thing that matter.

If it was a country like Canada, with a population of less than 50 million people, that would be problematic.

Losing 15% of your population on a yearly basis isn’t problematic, it’s species-ending catastrophic.

But with a population pool of 1.5 billion, what’s the actual concern? What social instability does this cause that a population of 1.5 billion already doesn’t?

To put it in perspective, that’s the same population loss ratio that japan is currently experiencing. Japan, the country that’s teetering on the brink of cultural and societal collapse from an aging population.

There will never be too few people in China

Yeah this sums up the problem fairly well. You’re so stuck in your personal opinion of china’s population that you can’t imagine for a moment the situation changing, regardless of what the data might be saying. You’re no better than the people who refused to believe climate change was occurring. Fuck your gut instinct, pay attention to the actual numbers.

The number of people is irrelevant in the context, only the birth vs death rate. For context, there were about 10.5 million deaths in China last year. For social stability, you’d want the population to at most have a slight decline. A 50% higher death rate than birth rate is NOT slight.

So essentially install a military dictatorship, because only the military gets any votes?

Bought it! A lot more reasonable and affordable with regional pricing enabled.