• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ve done this dance already.

    • Bully everyone and pass restrictive laws yields more piracy than ever, and a good crop of mentors for future pirates.
    • Build quality streaming services with excellent selection of media, and the piracy community shrinks. (Sad, when it happens, because there’s evidence that wide-coverage digital media preservation is nearly impossible without the piracy community.)

    It’s almost like the Movie Industry doesn’t care about any of the things they claim they care about…

    Edit: I guess it’s possible they’re playing out a long con to ensure their favorite episodes of “I Love Lucy” survive…

    Edit 2: No, I don’t really think they’re somehow secretly not the assholes they appear to be.

    • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It ““worked”” in France

      It still kills most of the userbase when they do it

      Normal people don’t know what a fucking dns is

      You end up with 10 more new sites and a drop in quality and an endless game of cat & mouse

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really depends on how much people want to get around it. I grew up in Vietnam, where when I was in about year 10 of high school, the government decided to start blocking Facebook. Their block was only DNS, so word quickly spread around the school that you could still access Facebook if you changed your DNS. This was before quad 9 or even Google’s quad 8 (the latter came around shortly after, which was a big improvement to how easy this became), so the DNS we ended up using was a difficult specific number to remember and communicate, but even despite that, by the end of the month pretty much everyone in school—from students to teachers—had learnt how to change their DNS to bypass the block.

        People always say that piracy is more popular when it’s easier than the legal means. And obviously adding a DNS block to pirating is going to increase its difficulty, and increase the relative convenience of legal means. But if the legal means continues getting worse and worse, at some point piracy is going to look more appealing again, and people will figure out how to bypass the DNS block.

  • Spendrill@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    A site-blocking law would let copyright owners “request, in court, that Internet service providers block access to websites dedicated to sharing illegal, stolen content,” he said. Rivkin claimed that in the US, piracy “steals hundreds of thousands of jobs from workers and tens of billions of dollars from our economy rich people’s yacht money, including more than one billion in theatrical ticket sales.”

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes. Theatre-going. The favorite pastime of Gen X, Millennials and Gen Z since the invention of streaming.

      /s

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I demand I2P become the standard for filesharing. We don’t all get what we want.

    Anti Commercial AI thingy

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    Inserted with a keystroke running this script on linux with X11

    #!/usr/bin/env nix-shell
    #!nix-shell -i bash --packages xautomation xclip
    
    sleep 0.2
    (echo '::: spoiler Anti Commercial AI thingy
    [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
    
    Inserted with a keystroke running this script on linux with X11
    ```bash'
    cat "$0"
    echo '```
    :::') | xclip -selection clipboard
    xte "keydown Control_L" "key V" "keyup Control_L"
    
    
  • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully this doesn’t affect quad9 or cloud flare DNS, or I might have to go back to running a root resolver. The horrors.

      • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I trust them more than my ISP (Verizon). Quad9 is, and I used it for some time as an upstream, but it is markedly slower for me than cloudflare. Those milliseconds add up for an impatient asshole like myself.

  • manwohats@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    for everytime Movie Industry tells ISP to block pirates, there is more smart pirates who can find away around the block!